The governor is proposing to spend more on fare enforcement than the MTA can ever hope to extract. You can add NZ to that list, so it is a perfect correlation with immigrant nations. Theyd be lynched if they tried that in France, and probably by other politicians Yeah, and did you read the very lengthy instructions about how to apply for the adult monthly travel card? Since racial identification is supposed to not occur in official stats. Non-car owners would be able to buy an annual pass. At the moment that the rail industry is having a long drawn out argument on the best way forward as everyone can see the season ticket is dying but the political cost of getting rid of it is too high, so some form of fudge will be needed. A fully EDIT: Ignore that, the CAG thread states OP had an Oyster card, not a freedom pass. But this meant Caltrain (or employers) had no data on actual usage. See In re 3M Bair Hugger Litigation, 924 N.W.2d 16, 24 (Minn. App. Is it a trip possible by biking or walking? This is the most farcical privatisation even by the comedic standards of British railways and the aim is to defeat one of the last holdouts of organised labour (England) Hi, I got a fare evasion summoning me to court, and Id like to know if theres a possible out of court settlement option from tfl as Im not trying to stain my record. Thelawyer who dealt with my caseput me at ease straight aware and was professional throughout my consultation. tfl fare evasion settle out of court proceedings of the international conference on learning representations. James provided an excellent service and put his excellent knowledge to help me get the best results in something that could have effected my whole professional and personal life in the UK. (LogOut/ But all rail travellers would. When I had an unlimited pass in New York, Id travel from Eastern Queens near the city limits to Manhattan for school on the weekdays, and go to Flushing on the weekends. Its true that Dunkirk is trialing free public transport, but Dunkirk isnt exactly a shining example of good transit and its free transit trial mostly reduced cycling rates with barely any effect on driving rates. My solicitorhas been extremelyprofessional and his confidence has put my mind at rest. I guess the numbers on Wikipedia are old, but according to its list, neither BVG nor MVV break even on fares. In the east, well Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan, there is a paternalistic care about the travelling public that balances the overt greed in the west, hence Japans government-imposed ceilings on fares. Webtfl fare evasion settle out of court. You need a way of preventing people to get down to the platforms. BTW, where did you get that data? This skewed thinking has meant that substantial financial burdens are being placed upon commuters (not to mention the public at large) whilst other beneficiaries of commuting (employers) are not contributing to its financing. Yes. I was lucky to find BSB Solicitorswho helped me with my case. Fare evasion rate on Hong Kongs open, non-gated, LRT system in year 2002-2005 was said to be only 0.4%, but there doesnt seems to be any more updated data. The greater sprawl is mostly because Tokyo is the larger capital of the larger country, with more than triple the population of Paris in terms of metro area. The local newspaper reports how other commuters have missed work so often, theyve lost their job; how students have missed exams or holidaymakers havent made flights. > And the S-Bahn gets subsidies because of lower suburban ridership, same as the RER/Transilien. It is very likely that your employer paid some part, and, depending on the size of the enterprise, it is a discount. They immediately made me feel at ease and left no stone unturned in order to achieve a successful conclusion to mycase. A big reason why many Americans would prefer to spend an hour in traffic rather than 30 minutes on a bus or train ir s that they dont want to deal with ill-behavior on the subway. The economic-rationalist argument is that this competition will force all players, especially those wickedly inefficient state bodies, to improve their customer service focus (just listen to Jean-Pierre Farandous statement on attaining the new job: pure management speak while covertly threatening the unions). (No doubt, partly econometric because of the cost-benefit calculation of replacing their antiquated coin-op turnstiles with something modern.). Most people will pay, one way regardless. Question is not whether, its by how much. Have you noticed that the new boss of SNCF, Jean-Pierre Farandou, was formerly boss of French Keolis? With an electronic payment system, you can have pretty non-interfering gates (which also makes it possible to charge per distance), they can be largely symbolic (just a tower you push your card against). I find it quite plausible that ordinary people actually find fairness in pricing according to cost very attractive and well fair. The cost burden of commuting is unevenly and unethically distributed amongst the beneficiaries of this utility. That maybe the US its not in the UK. Visitors would be on app based daily or weekly passes. Similarily just put a few machines on each bus that electronically can read transport cards, and let passengers get on and off as they like. cheaper transit promoting sprawl. 4) If I do it, do I THINK Im likely to get caught?, The more yes answers they reach, the LESS LIKELY they are to do it. Michal James, it is clear that you dont have any experience of very well run transit city, such as in East Asia, where rich and poor regularly alike use transit. A Monthly Travelcard for zones 1-4 (inner London) is 194.00 (US$243.87, 217.17) BSB Solicitors are regulated by the Solicitors It also wants to improve efficiency in order to procure a better rail service for Ile-de-France residents without increasing operating costs. Both are negatively impacted by heavy commute subsidies. Of course fare gates need manning so outside of the busiest stations fare gating is often a peak time only operation. Thanks, BSB Solicitors. The difference being that the far right sees this as a reason to hate transit and the far left as a reason to support it. the Foret de Fontainebleau is 2.5x the size of intramuros Paris! It seems a bit of a wasted effort otherwise, eh?, Oh, should of added, that this is why when youre designing your roaming checks youre really looking for how you can MAXIMISE the number of people that saw that check happen. Of all the oddities thrown up by rail privatisation, this must rank among the oddest: a train company in the business of running fewer trains. It is you who is artificially creating a them versus us war, which is reminiscent of London where there is definitely a class that would never use the Underground. However, this really isnt about revenue or enforcement approaches or fare levels. Maybe we are cognitively disadvantaged in the West compared to East Asians, but I would instead argue that it is more likely that with modern technology varying fares dynamically by distance is very straightforward (with 1990s technology) and westerners would adapt very quickly. I am on record on your blog as not supporting free transit, but I certainly believe in reasonable fares which inevitably means some subsidy, though it is true that it should not be called that, rather a sharing of costs among all those who benefit from transit. I can only think you are British because this is the kind of logic by which they run their transit. I dont know if the EUs Open Access is involved but this wilfully stupid experiment has plenty of evidence to suggest where it ends. ), * Paris + Petite Couronne are 762km^2 with a population density of 8.8k/km^2, * The 23 Wards of Tokyo are 619km^2 with a population density of 15.1k/km^2, * le-de-France is 12,012km^2 with a population density of 1.0k/km^2, * Itto Sanken is 13,500km^2 with a population density of 2.6k/km^2, * Kanto + Shizuoka (wide enough to cover pretty much every Tokyo commuter including distant Shinkansen suburbs, though is dominated by wilderness and includes many towns that dont have commute links with Tokyo at all) is 40,200km^2 with a population density of 1.1k/km^2. Ill try and post some of the tweets John Bull made about fare evasion when talking to Second Avenue Subways. Those casual fare evader mental questions are: 1) Do I already have, or can I buy a ticket right now? Of course with a monthly or unlimited-travel card, one doesnt think about it at all. Here is an argument for the 45-swipes threshold. Paris recently eliminated the zone restriction on certain Navigo cards thus reducing, in the most significant means, the previous disadvantage of those living further out and often less economically advantaged. Anyway, the reason London doesnt have these is because of their nitpicking fare system: they need you to swipe out to calculate the fare. For the other 5%, you would just put in the starting and ending destination in a machine, and the machine would tell you the price. Thats what a monthly/annual pass stands for. Why should commuters have to deal with people playing their music loud after a very long day at work. 2) BART has had teen-gang problems, where a dozen kids hop the fare gates, rob/assault the passengers, and leave en-mass at the next stop over the gates before any law enforcement appears. But if the choice would be between transit to have to look up the fare for, biking, or taking a car, Id just opt for the car. As part of a new campaign to combat fare evasion, the MTA hired new cops to police the subway. Of course it changes the math, especially since many people get to work from home every once in awhile. Paris has one-way faregates, so half the exit space is unusable during (one-way) busy times, and the exit gates are hard to open and easy to close in order to discourage fare dodging. This is how the Taipei busses work for example. BART has a three-pronged problem that it is dealing with concerning fare-evasion. I think its also right thing to talk about the sum of the three: Then theres this (below) which is sooo London (and again there could be some HK-inspired rebellion; will this system have face-recognition? The norm here is that big cities fund urban rail out of fares; the U-Bahn breaks even here, and I think also in Munich. Based on the statistics received with those means, the general pot gets distributed among the different operators. 70% of department 77 Seine-et-Marne) and has huge forests and national parks (eg. I do note that East Asian cities with nearly universal transit use, have very complex pricing that does not seem to bother anyone there. They were extremely professional and helpful. Anyway: the breakeven point for a zone 1-3 ticket is 48: the monthly is 158.30 with a travelcard, the peak single fare is 3.30. what is chad johnson doing now, orrin and orson west theories, brookhurst park baseball field,